Schlagwort Archiv: Lex Alerts

CELEX:62019CJ0380: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 25 June 2020.#Bundesverband der Verbraucherzentralen und Verbraucherverbände – Verbraucherzentrale Bundesverband e.V. v Deutsche Apotheker- und Ärztebank eG.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Consumer protection — Directive 2013/11/EU — Alternative dispute resolution — Article 13(1) and (2) — Mandatory information — Accessibility of information.#Case C-380/19.

e-Law Admin/ Juni 26, 2020/ EuGH-Rechtsprechung/ 0Kommentare

e-Law Trainer

CELEX:62019CO0634: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 16 June 2020.#CJ v Court of Justice of the European Union.#Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Action for failure to act — Article 265 TFEU — Law governing the institutions — Documents available to the public on the internet relating to closed General Court of the European Union and European Union Civil Service Tribunal cases — Request for anonymity ex post — Failure by the Court of Justice of the European Union to reply before the action was brought at first instance — Position adopted in the course of the proceedings — Action which has become devoid of purpose — No need to adjudicate — Appeal manifestly unfounded.#Case C-634/19 P.

e-Law Admin/ Juni 25, 2020/ EuGH-Rechtsprechung/ 0Kommentare

e-Law Trainer

CELEX:62018CJ0754: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 18 June 2020.#Ryanair Designated Activity Company v Országos Rendőr-főkapitányság.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Citizenship of the European Union — Directive 2004/38/CE — Articles 5, 10 and 20 — Right of entry to a Member State of a third-country national who is a member of the family of an EU citizen — Evidence of holding such a right — Possession of a residence card of a family member of a Union citizen — Possession of a permanent residence card.#Case C-754/18.

e-Law Admin/ Juni 21, 2020/ EuGH-Rechtsprechung/ 0Kommentare

e-Law Trainer

CELEX:62019CO0575: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 11 June 2020.#GMP-Orphan (GMPO) v European Commission.#Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Service of the judgment under appeal by means of e-Curia — Appeal lodged out of time — Extension of the time limit — Precluded — Appeal manifestly inadmissible.#Case C-575/19 P.

e-Law Admin/ Juni 20, 2020/ EuGH-Rechtsprechung/ 0Kommentare

e-Law Trainer

CELEX:62018CJ0639: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 18 June 2020.#KH v Sparkasse Südholstein.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Consumer protection — Distance marketing of financial services — Directive 2002/65/EC — Article 1 — Scope — Contracts concerning financial services consisting of an initial agreement followed by successive operations — Application of Directive 2002/65/EC to the first agreement alone — Article 2(a) — Concept of ‘contract concerning financial services’ — Amendment to a loan agreement altering the interest rate initially set.#Case C-639/18.

e-Law Admin/ Juni 19, 2020/ EuGH-Rechtsprechung/ 0Kommentare

e-Law Trainer

CELEX:62018CJ0078: This document does not exist in English.          Arrêt de la Cour (grande chambre) du 18 juin 2020.#Commission européenne contre Hongrie.#Manquement d’État – Recevabilité – Article 63 TFUE – Liberté de circulation des capitaux – Existence d’une restriction – Charge de la preuve – Discrimination indirecte liée à la provenance des capitaux – Article 12 de la charte des droits fondamentaux de l’Union européenne – Droit à la liberté d’association – Réglementation nationale imposant des obligations d’enregistrement, de déclaration et de publicité, assorties de sanctions, aux associations recevant des aides financières en provenance d’autres États membres ou de pays tiers – Article 7 de la charte des droits fondamentaux – Droit au respect de la vie privée – Article 8, paragraphe 1, de la charte des droits fondamentaux – Droit à la protection des données à caractère personnel – Réglementation nationale imposant la divulgation d’informations relatives aux personnes apportant une aide financière à des associations et au montant de cette aide – Justification – Raison impérieuse d’intérêt général – Transparence du financement associatif – Article 65 TFUE – Ordre public – Sécurité publique – Lutte contre le blanchiment de capitaux, le financement du terrorisme et le crime organisé – Article 52, paragraphe 1, de la charte des droits fondamentaux.#Affaire C-78/18.

e-Law Admin/ Juni 18, 2020/ EuGH-Rechtsprechung/ 0Kommentare

e-Law Trainer