Superior Seafoods, Inc. v. Tyson Foods, Inc.

E-Law Admin/ September 3, 2010/ Zivilrecht/ 0Kommentare

Superior Seafoods, Inc. v. Tyson Foods, Inc., 09-2031

District court’s denial of plaintiff’s Rule 60(d)(3) motion to vacate an underlying consent judgment involving a series of trademark-related actions stemming from plaintiff’s sale of a seafood-products business to defendant is affirmed as, given the facts, and given the equitable requirement that the party seeking relief be free from negligence and fault, the district court clearly did not abuse its discretion in finding equitable relief inappropriate in this case.

Appellate Information

  • Submitted 02/09/2010
  • Decided 09/03/2010
  • Published 09/03/2010



  • United States Eighth Circuit


e-Law Trainer

Share this Post

Hinterlasse einen Kommentar