Equitable Res., Inc. v. United Steel, Paper & Forestry, Rubber, Mfg., etc.
Equitable Res., Inc. v. United Steel, Paper & Forestry, Rubber, Mfg., etc., 08-6444
In a company’s suit under section 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act (LMRA) to vacate or modify the arbitration award against it, district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the union is affirmed where: 1) the arbitrator did not exceed his authority by interpreting the CBA in a way that allowed the company to be found liable for a breach; 2) the arbitrator did not exceed the scope of his authority to decide a representational issue in this case because the arbitrator’s successor decision was permissible in furtherance of his interpretation of the CBA; 3) the award’s remedy does not violate public policy; and 4) the arbitrator did not dispense his own brand of industrial justice.
- Argued 03/11/2010
- Decided 09/16/2010
- Published 09/16/2010
- United States Sixth Circuit